The Floor · FEC filings 2021–2026

The Floor.

Every member of Congress, drawn to scale. The scale is how much money drug-company PACs and drugmaker employees gave them. PHARMA Holdings plc is proud to support democracy.

—to this chamber
—took pharma PAC money
—took $0
DemocratRepublicanIndependentBigger = more pharma PAC money · top hat = top 10

Hover or tap a member for the numbers. Click or tap again for the full record. Check your own state ↓

Your delegation

Check your people.

Pick your state. Two senators, every House member, the pharma PAC money, the committees, the votes.

The Fat Cat Caucus

Top ten, by the filings.

The ten members of this chamber with the most drug-company money in the period covered (switch “Size by” to compare PAC vs employee money).

The Lobby

Campaign checks are the tip. This is the iceberg.

What drugmakers and their trade groups reported spending on federal lobbying, per LDA.gov disclosures. Lobbying is spent on issues, not handed to members.

Top spenders, 2025

The bills they lobbied on most

Source: LDA.gov lobbying disclosures (self-filer expenses, or outside-firm income where a company didn’t self-file). 2026 = first half only. Trade groups are funded by member dues, so the industry total double counts some money. Bayer’s figure includes crop science; J&J’s includes medtech. Former-government counts come from lobbyists’ disclosed “covered positions” and are a minimum.

The $0 Club

Took nothing. Noted.

Members of this chamber with $0 from the drug-company money we track (in the current “Size by” mode). Fairness is part of the receipts.

Methodology

What we counted, exactly.

Source: the FEC

Official Federal Election Commission bulk filings: contributions from committees to candidates.

Which PACs

Political action committees connected to pharmaceutical and biotech drug manufacturers and their trade groups. Not insurers, PBMs, pharmacies, distributors, hospitals or device makers. The full list is below so you can audit it.

Employee money

Itemized donations ($200+) from people who listed a drug manufacturer as their employer, to each member’s principal campaign committee, refunds netted, earmarks counted once. It’s their personal money, not the company’s. Ambiguous employer strings are left out, so it leans low.

Leadership PACs

Members run side PACs (“leadership PACs”) that drug-company PACs also give to. We count those separately, attributed to the member the FEC lists as sponsor, 2021–2026. Shared or unsponsored committees are left out.

What it doesn’t include

Unitemized small donations, lobbying spend, super PACs and dark money. The real number of industry dollars around a member is usually larger than what’s drawn here.

What it doesn’t mean

PAC contributions are legal and publicly disclosed. A contribution is not a bribe and doesn’t prove anything about a vote. It’s a receipt. Read it, then read the votes.